Choosing Among Public Schools: Open Enrollment
in the 17th Senate District
Wisconsin families are currently in the midst of the public
school open enrollment period for the 2016-2017 school year.
This program has a major impact on the finances of many school
districts in our communities by allowing families to choose
among the public schools in their area.
The open enrollment program is an inter-district program that
allows parents to enroll their children in a public school
district other than the one in which they reside. First
established for the 1998-99 school year, the open enrollment
program allows any student from 4k to grade 12 to apply to a
nonresident school district via an application process
coordinated by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
(DPI).
Statewide, 53,188 students enrolled in public schools other than
their resident school district during the 2014-2015 school year.
This accounted for $289.6 million transferred between public
schools. In the 17th Senate District, 1,966 students enrolled in
public school districts other than their resident district. As a
result, approximately $1.3 million was transferred to other
public school districts.
During the application process, both the resident and
nonresident school districts can deny the application for a
student to open enroll based on a number of factors, including:
availability of space in the school, the transferring student’s
disciplinary record, or student-teacher ratios. If the request
is denied, there is an appeals process with the DPI, but the
department is required to affirm the decision of the local
district unless they find it was arbitrary or unreasonable.
If the student’s application is accepted, the student is
enrolled in the school of their choice, the resident school
district transfers a set amount of funds to the chosen school
district and the parents are responsible for transportation to
and from school.
The open enrollment funding formula is where the major financial
impact to school districts is realized.
On one hand, the resident school district does not lose the
student in their count for enrollment numbers. The pupil
enrollment number is the largest factor that determines the size
of a school district’s budget.
On the other hand, however, the resident district must transfer
funds to the nonresident district for each student who is
enrolled in another district during open enrollment. For the
2014-15 school year, the state determined amount was $6,635 per
student. The 2015-16 amount is $6,639.
While the students and funds transferred to another district do
not impact the amount of the overall school district’s budget,
it does impact the bottom-line of the school district’s budget
because they have to “cut-a-check” to another district for
$6,639 per student who transfers to another district.
For example, if a student resides in School District A but has
successfully applied to attend School District B, School
District A can count this student in its pupil membership for
its revenue limit and general aid. However, School District A
would then send $6,639 to School District B for taking the
additional student.
For School District A, the amount that needs to be transferred
for each student to School District B is resources and funds
they cannot spend in their own budget. In other words, the
payment to School District B for taking these students is an
expense for School District A. School District A cannot levy
additional property taxes to make up the difference. School
District B, which is receiving additional revenue, can use these
resources outside of their revenue limit to increase their own
budget.
Following is the most recent data below showing individual
school districts in the 17th Senate District and the number of
students that have transferred into and out of those districts.
Our local schools are important to the success of our
communities. As I mentioned before, because enrollment is one of
the largest factors that impacts the size of our local school
budgets, I will continue to monitor the movement of students in
our local school districts. 2014-15 Open
Enrollment Total Transfers In & Out
School District |
2014-15 Membership |
Transfers In |
Transfers Out |
Net |
Net % |
Argyle |
347 |
16 |
44 |
-28 |
-8.0% |
Belmont |
358 |
32 |
37 |
-5 |
-1.4 |
Benton |
245 |
36 |
30 |
6 |
2.4 |
Black Hawk |
389 |
28 |
51 |
-23 |
-5.9 |
Boscobel |
813 |
37 |
47 |
-10 |
-1.2 |
Cassville |
217 |
8 |
28 |
-20 |
-9.2 |
Cuba City |
664 |
76 |
67 |
9 |
1.3 |
Darlington |
782 |
44 |
51 |
-7 |
-0.1 |
Dodgeville |
1,290 |
57 |
87 |
-30 |
-2.3 |
Fennimore |
776 |
38 |
26 |
12 |
1.5 |
Highland |
284 |
29 |
12 |
17 |
6.0 |
Hillsboro |
503 |
48 |
25 |
23 |
4.6 |
Iowa-Grant |
754 |
33 |
52 |
-19 |
-2.5 |
Ithaca |
318 |
98 |
32 |
66 |
20.7 |
Lancaster |
938 |
33 |
34 |
-1 |
0.0 |
Mauston |
1,477 |
94 |
89 |
5 |
0.0 |
Mineral Point |
721 |
60 |
51 |
9 |
1.2 |
Monroe |
2,573 |
101 |
151 |
-50 |
-1.9 |
Necedah |
709 |
35 |
67 |
-32 |
-4.5 |
New Lisbon |
618 |
121 |
69 |
52 |
8.4 |
Pecatonica |
452 |
25 |
56 |
-31 |
-6.8 |
Platteville |
1,496 |
67 |
53 |
14 |
0.1 |
Potosi |
338 |
31 |
22 |
9 |
2.7 |
Reedsburg |
2,670 |
91 |
159 |
-68 |
-2.5 |
Richland |
1,423 |
71 |
145 |
-74 |
-5.2 |
River Ridge |
530 |
27 |
40 |
-13 |
-2.4 |
River Valley |
1,348 |
44 |
108 |
-64 |
-4.7 |
Riverdale |
725 |
17 |
77 |
-60 |
-8.3 |
Royall |
622 |
31 |
83 |
-52 |
-8.4 |
Shullsburg |
392 |
25 |
30 |
-5 |
-1.3 |
Southwestern |
572 |
25 |
50 |
-25 |
-4.4 |
Weston |
312 |
21 |
22 |
-1 |
0.0 |
Wonewoc-Union Center |
373 |
42 |
71 |
-29 |
-7.8 |
*Source: Legislative Fiscal Bureau, February 2016
There are many reasons parents cite for moving their student to
another school district. Some families choose to enroll their
child in another district for academic, athletic and geographic
reasons. Others are seeking additional extra-curricular
opportunities. Whatever the reasons may be, open enrollment may
play a major part in the financial situation for a school
district.
The regular open enrollment application period for the 2016-17
school year runs from February 1 until April 29, 2016. For more
information and the application, please visit the DPI’s website:
http://dpi.wi.gov/open-enrollment.
For more information and to connect with me, visit my website
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/senate/17/marklein and subscribe
to my weekly E-Update by sending an email to
Sen.Marklein@legis.wisconsin.gov.
Do not hesitate to call 800-978-8008 if you have input, ideas or
need assistance with any state-related matters. |
Legislation To Allow Anglers
and Sportsmen to
Cross Railroad Tracks Passes Assembly
Bill prevents railroad companies
from issuing trespass citations for crossing railroad tracks
for hunting and to fish Wisconsin rivers, lakes and streams.
Assembly Bill (AB) 876 was passed by the State Assembly on
February 16, 2016. I authored the Senate companion bill – Senate
Bill (SB) 734 – which provides that the prohibition on entering
or remaining on railroad tracks does not apply to a person
walking directly across the tracks or right-of-way of a
railroad.
I have heard from many sportsmen and women in the 17th Senate
District who are concerned about a railroad suddenly enforcing
an existing state law that prohibits a person from entering
railroad tracks. Many locations for hunting and fishing on our
rivers, streams and lakes require a person to cross railroad
tracks. This bill would change the law to allow a person to walk
directly across the tracks to do so.
Current law prohibits a person to “enter or remain on railroad
tracks.” It offers some exceptions for public highways and for a
person to drive across them from one part of the person’s land
to another, such as a driveway or farm field.
Recently, a railroad has begun enforcing this law and issuing
warnings to individuals found crossing the tracks on foot to
fish. The railroad believes it is a liability issue.
As the State Senator for the 17th Senate District, I am proud to
lead this effort in the Senate and hopeful that we will be able
to provide a way for sportsmen and women to fish and hunt while
encouraging safety. We need to find a compromise between the
interests of sportsmen and the responsibility of the railroad.
AB 876 was passed by the Assembly and is now before the Senate. |
In The 17th Senate District

My
wife Peggy (right) and I attended the Platteville Chamber of
Commerce's Annual Dinner last week. Congratulations to all
of the businesses and organizations who were nominated and
chosen for awards. Thank you for your investment in our
community and for your commitment to make Platteville a
wonderful place to live, learn and do business!

I
joined several fellow community leaders and legislators for the
annual Hope House Fundraising dinner. Pictured from left
to right, Rep. Joan Ballweg (R-Markesan), Sheriff Chip Meister,
Sheriff Brent Oleson, Peggy Marklein, Julie Oleson, Barb Brooks,
Sen. Howard Marklein and Rep. Ed Brooks (R-Reedsburg). Hope
House provides shelter and advocacy to people affected by
domestic violence and sexual assault in our communities.
In The Capitol

Educators from Wonewoc-Center High School visited with Sen.
Howard Marklein and Rep. Ed Brooks to talk about the future of
technical education and School-To-Work programs in their school
district. Pictured left to right: Sen. Howard Marklein,
Rusty Chute, Dr. Sharon Ennis, Susan Goyette and Rep. Ed
Brooks.

Sen. Marklein joined his fellow UW Whitewater alumni at the 10th
Annual UW Whitewater Day at the Capitol. Pictured left to right:
Rep. Rob Hutton, Rep. Samantha Kerkman Rep. Robin Voss, Sen.
Steve Nass, UW Whitewater Chancellor Beverly Copper, Sen.
Marklein, Rep. Cody Horlacher, Rep. Mike Kuglitsch. |
Useful Information
County Sales Tax Distributions
The following table shows county sales tax distributed to the
counties that have enacted the 0.5% local sales tax.
County Sales Tax Distributions
January - December 2015
County |
Total |
Grant |
$3,267,522.32 |
Green |
$2,491,234.12 |
Iowa |
$1,688,280.34 |
Juneau |
$1,550,115.62 |
Lafayette |
$835,539.24 |
Monroe |
$3,316,443.19 |
Richland |
$1,049,883.88 |
Sauk |
$8,444,614.20 |
Vernon |
$1,649,723.25 |
Total 17th
District |
$24,293,396.16 |
Statewide |
$344,931,451.21 |
Source:
Wisconsin Department of Revenue - Division of Enterprise
Services |