Assembly in
Session
The Assembly was in session Wednesday and
Thursday this week to discuss non-budget legislation. Among some of the key
bills passed were:
·
Assembly
Bill 225: AB 225 made various reforms to campaign finance and
election laws. As originally introduced, this bill was controversial.
However, on Monday, June 10, the Assembly elections committee approved
sweeping changes to eliminate most of the more contentious elements from AB
225. As a result of these changes, the bill gained bipartisan support and
passed out of committee on an 8-1 vote. Some of the most notable provisions
are an increase in individual donation limits, which have not changed since
1970, and authorizing online voter registration. I am happy both sides of
the aisle were able to work together to reach a compromise. The Assembly
passed AB 225 on Wednesday, June 12, in a bipartisan voice vote. It will
now go to the Senate for further consideration.
·
Senate Bill
200: SB 200 made important reforms to unemployment insurance (UI)
in Wisconsin. As I mentioned in a previous E-Update, earlier this session I
was part of a UI working group with several of my legislative colleagues.
We each reached out to our constituents for input about wasteful and
fraudulent UI claims in their businesses. As a former small business owner
myself, I know the challenges many employers face during times of economic
uncertainty. In its current structure, our state’s UI program is
unsustainable, carrying an $876 million debt at the end of 2012. SB 200
increases the maximum weekly unemployment payout while also putting limits
on who is eligible to collect UI. A standardized handbook will also help to
clarify the responsibilities of both the employer and employee on what
unemployment insurance is and when it is paid. Likewise, SB 200 allows for
periodic audits to ensure the state is appropriately paying out UI claims.
These reforms will help root out waste and abuse while protecting
legitimate UI claims. The Senate passed SB 200 on Tuesday, June 11, and the
Assembly concurred in it the following day on a 61-35 vote. SB 200 will now go to Governor
Walker for his approval.
As I’ve said before, if you are facing issues
regarding unemployment insurance as an employer or employee in the 67th
Assembly District, please do not hesitate to contact my office. I appreciate
all of those who have reached out so far.
·
Assembly Bills
175,
176, and
187:
These bills, all of which had bipartisan support and passed on voice votes
on Thursday, are intended to make it easier for law enforcement and the
courts to respond to domestic violence. AB 175 requires law enforcement
officers who respond to domestic violence calls and do not make arrests to
file reports explaining their reasons for not doing so. AB 176 includes
various reforms to the domestic abuse temporary restraining order process.
AB 187 allows judges and juries in domestic abuse trials to hear evidence
about past acts of domestic violence committed by defendants. These bills
will go to the Senate for further consideration.
·
Assembly
Bill 216: AB 216, which I cosponsored, generally prohibits the
state’s Group Insurance Board from entering into contracts with group health
insurers that cover abortion services. AB 216 also generally exempts
insurers from the requirement to cover prescription contraceptives if the
insurer offers a group health insurance plan to certain religious entities.
The Assembly passed AB 216 on a 58-39 vote on Thursday, and the bill
will go to the Senate for further consideration.
·
Assembly
Bill 217: AB 217, which I cosponsored, prohibits the knowing
performance of a sex-selective abortion, an abortion that is requested
solely because of the unborn child’s sex. AB 217 permits civil actions to
be taken against abortionists who perform such procedures. The Assembly
passed AB 217 on a 58-39 vote on Thursday, and the bill will now go to the
Senate for further consideration.
·
Senate Bill
206: As amended and passed by the Senate on Wednesday, SB 206,
which I cosponsored, generally requires an abortionist to arrange for his or
her patient to receive an ultrasound; during the ultrasound, the person
performing the ultrasound must then display the images, including any
detectable heartbeat, so the mother has the opportunity to see them. The
person performing the ultrasound would also provide oral information
explaining the images. SB 206 provides exceptions to the ultrasound
requirement in cases involving medical emergencies, sexual assault, or
incest. The mother would also have the choice between a transabdominal and
a transvaginal ultrasound. The Assembly concurred in SB 206 on Thursday on
a 56-39 vote, and SB 206 will go to the Governor for his signature.
Budget Update
As I mentioned last week’s E-Update, the
Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee (JFC) completed its work on
Assembly Bill
40, the 2013-2015 state budget. The Assembly currently plans to
vote on AB 40 next week. The Assembly substitute amendment that
incorporates JFC’s changes will be released in the near future, but you can
compare JFC’s version of the budget with Governor Walker’s original bill in
a 765-page
comparative summary assembled by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The LFB
has also published
a number of other interesting papers concerning changes to taxes and
fees, non-policy items in the budget, the budget’s impact on property taxes,
and other subjects.
|