Electrician
Bill and Marriage Fix
The Assembly met on Tuesday and Thursday
of this week, and I am happy to say that both the Assembly and Senate
passed
Assembly Bill 683, which I introduced and which establishes
standards for licensing electricians. As I mentioned in last
week's E-Update, AB 683 will make it possible for the Department of
Safety and Professional Services to enter into reciprocity agreements
with other states that have equivalent standards so that a qualified
Wisconsin electrician will be able to travel to areas where electricians
are in demand without having to, among other bureaucratic requirements,
take a separate test in each state. This means more job
opportunities for Wisconsin electricians and more money for their
families and businesses. AB 683 will now go to Governor Walker for
his approval. I would again like to thank all of the parties with
whom I have worked over the past year to develop an acceptable
consensus, and I look forward to Wisconsin's electrician licensing
requirements taking effect this spring.
On Wednesday, I testified to the Senate
government operations committee on behalf of
Assembly
Bill 429, a bill I introduced at the request of the Wisconsin County
Clerks Association. AB 429 requires that a person be at least 18
years old to officiate at a marriage ceremony, and it also repeals an
outdated, unnecessary requirement that clergy from other states obtain a
"letter of sponsorship" if they want to officiate at a marriage ceremony
in Wisconsin. The Assembly passed AB 429 last week on a voice
vote, and I look forward to the Senate acting on it in the near future.
Other Assembly Activity
As the 2013-2014 legislative session nears
its end and legislators scramble to get their bills through, the lists of
bills the Assembly takes up during each floor session grows longer and
longer. Here are just a few of the many bills the Assembly voted on
this week:
Senate Bill
73: SB 73 creates workplace
wellness program grants under the Department of Health Services. The
bill allows small businesses that implement health or fitness programs for
employees to apply for grants to cover up to 30% of their costs to provide
such programs. The ultimate goal of these programs is the improve
employees' health and consequently drive down healthcare costs. The
Senate passed SB 73 last November, and the Assembly, with my support,
concurred in an amended version on Tuesday. The Senate must now concur
in the Assembly amendment.
Assembly
Bill 750: Under current law, living
wages ordinances are prohibited except for employees or contract employees
of local governments and employees performing work funded by local
governments. AB 750, as amended by Assembly Substitute Amendment 1,
extends the prohibition to those employees if they perform work that
is wholly or partially funded by state or federal funds that pass through
the state treasury. I supported AB 750 because it ensures that taxpayers
in one municipality or county are not footing the bill - through their state
and federal taxes - for living wage
ordinances in other municipalities or counties, where they have no representation.
Local officials may still choose to implement an inflated wage ordinance,
but it must be done using the local government’s own tax dollars. The Assembly passed AB 750
56-37.
Assembly
Bill 770: AB 770 creates an
emergency heating assistance loan guarantee program under the Wisconsin
Housing and Economic Development Authority, to help middle-class families during declared states
of emergency relating to heating costs or heating fuel shortages . AB
770 was introduced in response to the recent propane shortage. The
Assembly passed AB 770 on a 94-1 vote.
(On a related note,
Governor Walker has announced an agreement between the state, Madison
Gas and Electric, and We Energies to access over 117,000 gallons of propane
for Wisconsin residents who qualify for low-income energy assistance.)
Senate Bill
547: SB 547 establishes a variance
from wastewater discharge limits for phosphorus for facilities (point
sources) that are unable to meet current phosphorus discharge limits without
major upgrades. SB 547 does not change the phosphorus discharge
standards themselves, but, if the Department of Administration concludes
that it is not feasible for a given facility to meet the current limits, the
facility may request a variance that comes with two conditions: 1) it must
set up a schedule under which it will come into compliance within 20 years
and meet increasingly higher benchmarks every five years during that time;
and 2) it must take a course of action designed to reduce phosphorus
pollution from non-point sources (like agricultural runoff). A
facility may pay the local county $50 per pound of phosphorus pollution it
generates above the discharge standard, up to $640,000 per year; the county
would use this money to fund projects to reduce phosphorus pollution in the
same water basin as the facility and/or to model and monitor phosphorus
discharges. A facility could also enter into an agreement with the
Department of Natural Resources that it will implement phosphorus reduction
projects itself or enter into an agreement with a third party to carry out
such projects.
The Senate passed SB 547 on Tuesday, and the
Assembly concurred on Thursday in a bipartisan 76-19 vote. I supported
the bill because it leaves current standards in place while allowing
facilities to ease into them, avoiding considerable expenses that immediate
upgrades may entail, as long as they take steps in the meantime to
reduce phosphorus pollution through other means. SB 547 will now go to
Governor Walker for his approval.
The next floor session period begins March
11.
|