To: Senate Select Committee on Clean Energy Assembly Special Committee on Clean Energy Jobs Copy: Members, Wisconsin Legislature From: Aggregate Producers of Wisconsin Associated Builders & Contractors of Wisconsin, Inc Associated General Contractors of Wisconsin Eau Claire Area Chamber of Commerce Fond du Lac Association of Commerce Forward Janesville, Inc. Fox Cities Chamber of Commerce & Industry Green Bay Area Chamber of Commerce Heart of the Valley Chamber of Commerce Independent Business Association of Wisconsin La Crosse Area Chamber of Commerce Marshfield Area Chamber of Commerce & Industry Menomonee Falls Chamber of Commerce Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce Midwest Equipment Dealers Association Midwest Food Processors Association National Federation of Independent Businesses – Wisconsin Chapter Oshkosh Chamber of Commerce Racine Area Manufacturers & Commerce Waukesha County Chamber of Commerce Wausau Region Chamber of Commerce West Bend Area Chamber of Commerce Wisconsin Automobile & Truck Dealers Assn. Wisconsin Automotive Aftermarket Association Wisconsin Automotive Parts Association Wisconsin Cast Metals Association Wisconsin Economic Development Association Wisconsin Engine Manufacturers & Distributors Alliance Wisconsin Housing Alliance Wisconsin Independent Businesses Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Wisconsin Motor Carriers Association Wisconsin Paper Council Wisconsin Petroleum Council Wisconsin Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association Wisconsin Retail Council Wisconsin Utility Investors, Inc. Date: April 15, 2010 Subject: Substitute Amendment to SB 450 & AB 649 (Global Warming Bill) As representatives of Wisconsin’s manufacturing, agriculture, construction, transportation and economic development communities, we continue to oppose the amended global warming legislation (AB 649/SB 450). Although the substitute amendment removes a number of highly controversial provisions – such as California’s low emission vehicle standards and low carbon fuel standards – the bill still contains provisions that will substantially increase electricity rates and harm Wisconsin’s economy. In fact, not only does the substitute amendment fail to address the significant increase in energy costs, the amendment language will make the bill worse by further increasing electric rates. While we continue to review the 150-page substitute amendment, we note that many of our concerns were not addressed. For example, the substitute amendment still contains the two most costly provisions: 1) a 25 percent Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) by 2025; and 2) new energy efficiency surtaxes. Equally alarming, the substitute amendment requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to establish energy taxes and policies that will ensure Wisconsin meets or exceeds the aggressive greenhouse gas emission reduction targets in the bill (a 75% reduction by 2050). In this regard, the amendment takes the voluntary targets from the original bill, and makes them enforceable at an enormous cost to our jobs and economy. Renewable Portfolio Standard The substitute amendment still includes the most costly provision – a 25 percent renewable energy mandate. Although the substitute amendment makes a few changes to the original bill, those changes are minor and will do nothing to bring down the substantial costs associated with this provision. Last week, Wisconsin utilities estimated the cost of complying with the 25 percent RPS at staggering $15 billion – costs that will be passed along to homeowners and businesses alike. We simply cannot afford to hit our economy with these costs at a time when consumers can least afford it, and when we already have a 30 percent oversupply of electric generation. Energy Efficiency Provisions Existing law caps how much large industrial ratepayers must pay for energy efficiency programs. Existing law also provides other limitations that apply to all ratepayers. The amendment effectively eliminates these limits and directs the Public Service Commission to assess whatever fees it deems necessary to enable the state to meet or exceed the bill’s greenhouse emission and energy consumption reduction goals. This will result in excessive utility fees on industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers far in excess of what is now levied. Based upon PSC analysis, this new energy tax is expected to cost Wisconsinites at least $700 million per year – the equivalent of an 11 percent increase in the state income tax. In conclusion, we continue to oppose passage of this legislation because it will significantly increase electric rates, result in job loss, and make our state a less competitive place to do business. Page 2