State Budget Issues

1. Auto Insurance  5. DOJ Cuts 9. Illegal Immigrants 13. Policy in the budget 17. Stewardship
2. Capital Gains Tax 6. Domestic Partners 10. Liability Law 14. Phone Tax 18. Tax Increases
3. DMV Closures 7. Earmarks 11. Nursing Home Tax 15. Prevailing wage 19. Tobacco Tax
4. DNR Service Centers 8. Education 12. Oil Tax 16. Spending increase 20. Use Value Assessment

7. Earmarks


Background:

Over the years, both parties have included spending for “location-specific” projects (aka earmarks or pork) in the state budget.  Some say this helps vulnerable legislators get reelected or helps ensure a particular legislator votes for the budget.  Earmarks typically cost a few million dollars in a budget.

This budget had to address an unprecedented budget deficit of over $6 billion, by raising taxes and fees by $2 billion, cutting programs, and using federal 'stimulus' funds.  To gauge opinion on earmarks in this context, I invited people throughout the region to respond to an online poll question about whether earmarks are a good idea given our budget trouble.  An overwhelming majority of 94% said earmarks are inappropriate at this time.  I supported an amendment to remove all budget earmarks.   

Outcome:

The budget bill passed with dozens of earmarks intact.  Total earmark spending is just more than $30,000,000.  All of the following are examples of budget earmarks approved in the final budget bill:

$500,000 to help renovate the Grand Opera House in Oshkosh

  • $100,000 for a stone barn built in 1903 in the Town of Chase in Oconto County
  • $125,000 grant to remodel the L.E. Phillips Library in the city of Eau Claire
  • $50,000 grant to install playground equipment in Preservation Park on the Rock River in Beloit

 

SEE THE MOST CURRENT LIST OF EARMARKS APPROVED BY THE LEGISLATURE (PDF)



1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |