The Wisconsin Technical College System (WTCS) offers associate degree
programs, technical diplomas and certificates, and customized training at
48 campuses operated by 16 technical college districts. The system
employed 12,908 individuals, including 7,181 full- and part-time faculty,
in March 2006.
The technical college districts are local units of government. Each is
governed by an appointed board and funded through local property
taxes, tuition, student fees, and state and federal aid. A state agency—the
Technical College System Board and its 63 staff—oversees some district
operations, but each of the 16 districts develops its own personnel
policies and procedures, most of which are negotiated through collective
bargaining. Approximately two-thirds of technical college staff are
unionized employees.
At the direction of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, we evaluated
selected personnel policies and practices affecting both local and state
employees of WTCS, including:
compensation and fringe benefits for faculty and other employees,
including the technical college presidents;
the use and reporting of sick leave, vacation, and sabbatical time;
adherence to state laws and policies governing the procurement of
consulting services; and
the use of settlement agreements to resolve personnel issues.
Our analysis of the employment of felons within WTCS, which was also
requested by the Audit Committee, was described in a letter report
released in June 2006. “Back-up positions” or similar job protections are
not available to WTCS employees.
Funding and Expenditures
The expenditures of WTCS districts
and the System Board totaled
$1.1 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2005-06.
Employee salaries and fringe benefits
accounted for more than two-thirds
of that total. Local property taxes
were the source of 56.0 percent of
WTCS funding in FY 2005-06.
Salaries and Benefits
Average earnings vary because of
differences in the compensation
rates and workloads specified in
each district’s policies and collective
bargaining agreements.
In FY 2004-05, full-time WTCS
administrators earned an average
of $77,567. Full-time faculty earned
an average of $74,598, and full-time
support staff earned an average
of $43,636. In that year, 369 WTCS
employees had earnings of at least
$100,000.
Full-time workloads for WTCS
faculty, as defined by district
collective bargaining agreements,
averaged 35.7 hours per week.
In FY 2004-05, 68.2 percent of
full-time WTCS faculty earned
additional compensation by
working more than a full-time
workload. Most of the additional
earnings represent compensation
for teaching additional courses.
The average base salaries of WTCS
faculty are among the highest
reported nationally. Their average
annual earnings—which represent
base salaries plus additional compensation—
exceeded the average
annual earnings of full-time faculty
at the two-year University of
Wisconsin (UW) Colleges by
approximately $22,000.
We compared full-time faculty
earnings in the ten technical college
districts that also contain a four-year
UW System institution. In
7 of the 10 districts, average
earnings were higher for WTCS
faculty than for UW System faculty.
For example, in FY 2004-05, full-time
faculty at Southwest Wisconsin
Technical College earned an average
of $63,090. Full-time faculty at
nearby UW-Platteville earned an
average of $60,895, a difference of
$2,195. During the same period,
full-time faculty at Northeast
Wisconsin Technical College earned
an average of $82,406. Faculty at
nearby UW-Green Bay earned an
average of $57,199, or $25,207 less.
WTCS employees also earn fringe
benefits such as health and dental
insurance, life insurance, and
retirement benefits. All 16 districts
provide health insurance benefits to
full-time and at least some part-time
employees. In addition, all districts
provide health insurance benefits
to some retirees. District costs for
retiree insurance benefits totaled
$15.7 million in FY 2005-06.
Under new accounting rules, all
public employers will be required
to more fully disclose the costs of
non-pension retiree benefits no
later than FY 2009-10. Although
accounting rules do not require
employers to fund these costs, large
unfunded liabilities could adversely
affect employers’ credit ratings and
the cost of issuing bonds.
Of the 16 technical college districts,
13 have estimated their liabilities
for benefits already promised to
current and retired employees.
Actuarial estimates of the costs of
these non-pension post-retirement
benefits range from $3.3 million
for the Northeast district to
$228.6 million for the Milwaukee
Area district.
The magnitude of Milwaukee
Area’s liability suggests the district
could be challenged to meet its
future financial obligations without
significantly increasing revenues or
significantly reducing its operating
budget.
Compensation for technical college
presidents typically includes a salary
and the fringe benefits available
to other employees, as well as a
vehicle or vehicle allowance and
supplemental contributions to
retirement accounts. Technical
college presidents’ compensation in
FY 2005-06 ranged from $127,625 at
Southwest Wisconsin to $226,900 at
Milwaukee Area.
Leave Use
WTCS employees earn sick leave, as
required by statutes. The amount
earned each year varies based on
collective bargaining agreements
and individual district policies.
In FY 2004-05, full-time WTCS
employees reported using an
average of 6.0 days of sick leave.
On average, faculty reported using
3.2 days while support staff
reported using 8.9 days.
Although most full-time employees
reported using some sick leave
during FY 2004-05, 38.1 percent
of faculty reported using none,
compared to 17.8 percent of
administrators and 6.6 percent of
support staff. A greater percentage
of UW System employees reported
using no sick leave in 2005.
To evaluate compliance with leave
reporting requirements, we
reviewed 336 employee leave files.
Although most records appeared
to be complete, we found several
discrepancies between paper and
electronic leave records.
All technical college districts offer
sabbaticals to faculty, and seven
allow support staff or administrators
to apply for sabbatical leave. From
July 2004 through March 2006,
17 employees took sabbaticals,
including 15 faculty. We found
general compliance with sabbatical
procedures, although compliance
with reporting requirements could
be improved.
Retainer Agreements
We examined the extent to which
technical college districts contract
for professional services using
retainer agreements, which establish
fixed regular payments for agreedupon
services even though the
amount and type of work may vary.
Eight districts reported a total of ten
retainer agreements in FY 2005-06.
Six of the ten contracts were with
employee health care benefits
consulting firms.
While most retainer agreements met
specified procurement requirements,
we noted several concerns. In particular,
the Waukesha County and
Madison Area districts entered into
retainer agreements exceeding
$25,000 without following the
competitive selection process
required by law.
Settlement Agreements
Twelve of the 16 districts reported
that they had resolved personnel
issues by negotiating settlement
agreements with their employees.
The most common reason for
entering into an agreement was to
terminate employment because of
unsatisfactory performance.
Other reasons included position
elimination or restructuring, settlement
of discrimination complaints,
and termination for misconduct.
From July 2002 through March 2006,
81 settlement agreements were
negotiated, including 17 by the
Gateway district. Approximately
one-half of the agreements involved
administrators, with the remainder
evenly split between faculty and
support staff.
Settlement payments totaled
$1.5 million over the period we
reviewed. In addition, 47 of the
81 settlement agreements provided
employer-paid health insurance
benefits for varying periods.
Recommendations
Our recommendations address the need for (Agency Here) to:
improve the accuracy of reporting
long-term employee absences
(p. 50);
improve compliance with
requirements for reporting
sabbatical outcomes
(p. 54);
ensure that procurement
practices for retainer agreements
comply with state law and
WTCS policies
(p. 60);and
annually report to the WTCS
Board on the number, type,
and cost of any settlement
agreements they enter into
(p. 63).
We also include recommendations
for the WTCS Board to:
report to the Legislature on
all technical college districts’
plans for addressing liabilities
associated with retiree benefits
costs
(p. 38);and
direct its staff to monitor the
procurement policies and
practices of each district
(p. 60).