|
Roundabouts:
Information on Roundabouts:
Manitowoc County 'Nativity Scene' lawsuit, April
2010
Court ruling
County Executive Ziegelbauer statement
6/16/09,
Financial Overview of Manitowoc County with respect to
the sale of the Health Care Center (HCC) and current
operations.
Manitowoc County Employee Proposal
05/21/2009, Herald Times Reporter, "County
workers asked to take 5% pay cut; Ziegelbauer says
expenses need $1-2M reduction"
05/20/2009,
Managing Change Through Tough Economic Times
Health Savings Account (HSA) Plan for Manitowoc County
Employees:
06/06/2009,
Specific Procedure Incentive Network (SPIN)
03/03/2009,
Patrick McIlheran: How's this health savings account
working? Ask a union leader
2009,
Health Savings Account Rate Comparisons
06/2008
Manitowoc County HSA Case Study
01/2008 Office of the County Executive,
"Economic
Impact of Manitowoc County Health Savings Accounts"
10/27/2007 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
"Another View:
Lowering health care costs by empowering employees"
by Bob Ziegelbauer
Link to Powerpoint detailing the new health plan for
County AFSCME employees.
05/24/2007 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article,
"For
deputies, being in charge works"

02/22/2007
Americans for Prosperity's
Health Care Web Cast; Section 4: Manitowoc County
Executive Bob Ziegelbauer (from 82:00 - 93:00) (at this
link, toggle down to the March 1st & 2nd blog entries.)
01/23/2007 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
Madison bureau
podcast
Madison -- Some state lawmakers are looking to Manitowoc
County for the newest ideas in health care reform.
Listen
here: TUESDAY, Jan. 23, 2007,
12:03 p.m.
http://www.jsonline.com/watch/?watch=22
01/23/2007 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article,
"State's
Health Care Snit Costs a Week's Groceries"
01/13/2007
Herald Times Reporter, Editorial: Orchids & Onions
ORCHIDS to County Executive Bop
Ziegelbauer for working hard on containing health care
costs to the county and employees. The health savings
account plan option he has proposed would save
significant sums for covered employees and their
families. There is no single answer to the health care
issue, but each step helps.
01/09/2007 Oshkosh Northwestern
editorial,
"Manitowoc County may have Insurance Solution that
Works"
01/05/2007 Wisconsin Public Television program
Here and Now appearance.
12/23/2006 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
article, "Health Care Savings Make a Fine Gift"
Plan for Manitowoc County Employees
*
HSA Power Point
Presentation
*
HSA Proposal Savings
*
HSA
Savings Summary
*
Health Insurance Premium History
*
Detailed analysis which compares the current Blue Cross
PPO plan to the Anthem Lumenos plan
Manitowoc County Veteran Service Office:
"Patricia "Jane" Babcock was approved by unanimous voice
vote as county Veterans Service Officer. Babcock begins
her duties today." excerpt from 10/17/2007
Herald Times Reporter
article
Herald Times Reporter Open
Records Request
9/11/2007
Corp Counsel Letter;
Released Records
Manitowoc County Veteran Service Office Staffing Plan,
8/30/2007
Statement
by County Executive Bob Ziegelbauer -- Veteran's Service
Office, 8/29/2007
|
| Storm Water Runoff: There has
been discussion in Manitowoc regarding storm water
runoff. For your use and information, the
non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau has prepared the
following 07/27/2006 memo on the federal EPA Phase II
requirements: "Municipal
Storm Water Permit Overview". Further information can
be found in the Fiscal Bureau's 05/11/2005 Budget Paper #554, "Storm
Water Management" as well as from the rule itself,
Chapter NR 216, "Storm Water Discharge Permits", which
became effective August 1, 2004.
In regard to comments made by our Mayor in his May 2,
2007 article in the Lakeshore Chronicle,
("In
another matter, please do not load the street gutter or
curb apron with your yard waste. This causes suspended
solids to get into our storm water . Getting
rid of these suspended solids will cost taxpayers lots
of money as our assemblyman and senator voted to create
even tougher rules than the EPA were going to require of
city governments to clean up our rivers and lakes.")
below please find a response from the
Director of the Bureau of Watershed Management,
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources:
"I would
suppose he refers to NR 216, the rule which
implements the federal storm water regulations and
to NR 151, the nonpoint performance standard
rule. He is in error in that there was no vote on
either rule by the Assembly or the Senate.
Committees of each legislative house considered each
rule, and the Senate committee sent NR 151 back for
requested modifications (which were resolved) but I
don't think that even the committees actually voted
on either of them (except to request
modifications). The federal regulations
require municipalities of a certain size to
implement 6 minimum management measures: 1.
Public Information and Outreach to inform
citizens of storm water impacts; 2. Public
Involvement and Participation to allow the
public input into their municipalities storm water
activities; 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and
Elimination; 4. Construction Site Pollution
Control; 5. Post-Construction Storm Water
Management; and 6. Pollution Prevention.
NR 216 is consistent with these federal
requirements.
NR 151
was promulgated before NR 216 and was aimed at
controlling nonpoint source pollution. That rule
requires municipalities to reduce total suspended
solids by 20%, which increases to 40% by 2013 (as
compared to no controls). Both of these are limited
to the maximum extent practicable which means that
if reducing to these levels is prohibitively
expensive, the municipality can reduce them to the
extent that reasonably costed available technology
will allow. This could be the source of the claim
that the state has gone beyond federal
requirements. As with many statutes, these
regulations are silent on the specifics of how to
implement a particular provision(s) (in this case
numbers 5 and 6 above), and they leave it up to
states to decide the processes and standards to
adopt. If we had not provided this standard in
rule, we would be criticized for being to vague and
that we had not provided enough guidance on what,
for example, pollution prevention means.
One
other error in the Mayors' statement is that yard
waste is the cause of total suspended solids. It is
not. Yard waste, when it is deposited in gutters
and washed down through storm sewers and other
conveyances into lakes and rivers, contribute excess
nutrients and organic matter that cause algae blooms
-often blue-green algae which is toxic to humans and
pets - which in turn make the local lakes and rivers
undesirable to swim, boat, water ski, and otherwise
recreate in. When the excess algae, and for that
matter, the yard waste itself, decomposes in the
water, it depletes oxygen levels which results in
decreasing the number and diversity of fish and
other aquatic organisms, and can result in
significant fish kills."
updated:
October 18, 2011 |