It's
no secret that drunk or drugged driving is a persistent problem
in Wisconsin. According to the Wisconsin Department of
Transportation, in 2015 there were approximately 24,000
convictions for drunk driving, and alcohol-related crashes
killed 190 people and injured nearly 2,900 in our state. These
crashes are entirely preventable. I believe part of the reason Wisconsin has this issue is because our laws reflect a
drinking culture that does not take drinking and driving
seriously. To help change that, I co-sponsored three bills,
authored by
Rep. Jim Ott (R- Mequon) and
Senator Darling (R- River Hills), to increase the
penalties for Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) offenders, and I have been actively pushing
these bills in the legislature (See description of bills below).
One of these tragic deaths was Dylan Thorne. Dylan was 18
years old when a drunk driver with a blood alcohol content over
double the legal limit crossed the center line at 1:30 in the
afternoon and struck his
car head-on. Dylan's full-size Mercury Marquis is pictured to the
right.
Dylan's future was extinguished because of someone else's bad
choice.
His family told me that
he had just passed a placement exam that morning to
attend Fox Valley Technical College to pursue a career in law
enforcement. On Thursday, the Assembly Committee on Criminal
Justice and Public Safety held a public hearing on this package of
bills. I invited the Thorne family to testify before the
committee, telling the story of Dylan's horrific death and the
years-long ordeal in the courts that followed. I admire their
willingness to share Dylan with us as they strive to stop
senseless deaths like his.
Watch a news story by WBAY Channel 2 to learn more about
Dylan:
click here.
Watch the news story by WMTV Channel 15 to learn more
about this week's public hearing:
click here.
Dylan Thorne's Family
AB
97/SB 73: This bill creates a mandatory minimum sentence of
5 years for a conviction of homicide while OWI. Currently, the
law's maximum sentence ranges from 25 to 40 years, but it
does not specify a minimum sentence.
The bill allows for judicial discretion in cases in which the
deceased person was a passenger in the automobile which the
convicted person was driving, provided the judge gives a written
reason for deviating from the minimum.
AB
98/SB 74: Under current law, all repeat OWI offenders as
well as first time OWI offenders whose blood alcohol concentration is
0.15 or higher, are required to install an ignition interlock on
an automobile registered to them. The law requires that the
interlock device be in place on the automobile at the time the
driver’s license is reinstated, and must remain on the
automobile until the order expires. Unfortunately, a loophole
exists because some OWI offenders choose to drive before their
license is reinstated. In the event that that they are
stopped by an officer, they will be cited for driving without
a valid license, but not face the more serious offense of
violating the court order concerning the ignition interlock. This bill requires that those subject to an ignition interlock
order cannot drive any automobile without an interlock from the
time of conviction until the order expires. This bill does not
require the offender to install the interlock device on their
personal automobile until his or her license is reinstated,
however, if stopped while driving without a license the driver
will be cited for driving without the interlock unless the
automobile has an operating device in place.
AB
99/SB 72: This bill creates a mandatory minimum for fifth
and sixth offenses. Under current law, a person who commits a
fifth or sixth OWI offense is guilty of a Class G felony and may
be fined up to $25,000, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
Under current law, a person who commits a fifth or sixth OWI
offense must be fined at least $600 and imprisoned for at least
six months. Under this bill, for a fifth or sixth OWI offense, a
sentencing court is required to impose a sentence of at least 18 months confined in prison. |